When a claim package needs a review, not a full cost audit
Choosing between a focused variation claim review and a full project cost audit when a single package lands on the steering group agenda.
Not every commercial dispute needs a full ledger audit. When a contractor submits one heavy claim package, a variation and claim review often answers the steering group faster.
Signals that a focused review is enough
- The rest of the cost report is stable and recently reconciled
- The question is about one package’s arithmetic and support, not the whole budget
- A settlement meeting is already scheduled within three weeks
Signals you still need a full audit
- Multiple contracts feed one forecast and nobody trusts the allocations
- Prior internal reviews already missed duplicate charges
- A lender or board requires broader assurance language
What the review memo should contain
Separate calculation errors from entitlement arguments. Quantity surveyors and lawyers own the latter; cost auditors should not blur the line just to sound comprehensive.